Pantsers vs. Plotters
by Judy Alter
Writing
habits are individual things. I have long admired people who can plot out each
chapter and each scene before they ever sit down to write. Then they have a
road map to follow. Some leave room for flexibility, for the inevitable changes
that occur when you write, but basically they know where they’re going. And
writing a synopsis? Easy peasy—it’s all there in the outline. Some writers use
storyboards or whiteboards to keep track of scenes and characters as they
write. Or computer programs which allow you to move scenes around and such.
I on
the other hand wander blindly about in a familiar world, since I know the
settings of my series novels, but with little idea of where I’m going. My
publisher now requests a synopsis before accepting a proposal. But recently
after I signed a contract, the manuscript began to take a different direction
and ended up nowhere near what the synopsis had indicated. When I saw this
developing, maybe halfway through, I wrote the managing editor who requested a
new synopsis. Fortunately, it passed muster. There’s been one intervening novel
since, but now I find my mind going back to the original theme of that earlier
project.
The
trouble, you see, is that I’m a pantser. I write by the seat of my pants. I
prefer to dash off a page of rough notes, get the first sentence, and see what
happens when I go from there. Sometimes what happens is magic. Events seem to
unfold of their own accord, characters tell me what’s going to happen, and the
plot shapes itself, often taking turns I hadn’t expected. Many seasoned authors
will tell you to listen to your characters, and they will tell you what’s going
to happen. The late western novelist Elmer Kelton used to talk about two of his
novels in which the characters took over his typewriter or computer. One was Buffalo Soldier, which he intended to
feature a newly freed slave who becomes a buffalo soldier (one of the Negro
regiments on the western frontier). But a Comanche chief kept demanding equal
time, and eventually the book chronicled both their stories—the buffalo
soldier’s rise in life as the Comanche’s way of life disappeared. The other was
The Good Old Boys, which he wrote at
his dying father’s bedside and based on all the stories his father, a longtime
ranch foreman, had told him. The characters, he used to say, took over like a
cold-jawed horse with a bit.
I
don’t find it usually happens that easily, and sometimes I worry about what’s
going to happen next. I also worry a lot if the manuscript is going to reach an
acceptable word limit—I have a tendency to rush through things, so that my
friend and beta reader is always telling me to slow down. He also often tells
me I have too much going on in a book—which I wonder doesn’t spring from my
desperate attempt to pad the length. But once I finish it, I rarely make major
changes, like moving whole sections around, eliminating characters (I rejected
that suggestion recently), and the like.
One
trick that works for me when I settle down to write: set a goal of a thousand
words a day. I wrote a novel that way earlier this year and found it worked
well.
But
everyone has their own methods. What’s yours?
Judy Alter is the author of
two mysteries series—Kelly O’Connell Mysteries, including Skeleton in a Dead Space, No Neighborhood for Old Women, Trouble in a
Big Box, and the just-published Danger
Comes Home, and the Blue Plate Café Mysteries, which debuted this year with
Murder at the Blue Plate Café, with Murder at Tremont House to come next
year. Her books are available on Amazon and Smashwords. Also the author of
several historical novels set in the American West, she is the recipient of
Western Writers of America Owen Wister Award for Lifetime Achievement and several other
awards.
I write the same way. If I make an outline, it's usually to keep track of where I've been instead of where I'm going with the plot. I really enjoyed this interview, Judy. There are tons of people who tell you how to write. I've bought the books. But I still sit down at the computer and let my characters tell the story. I love mysteries and can't wait to read your book. God Bless!
ReplyDeleteTheresa Lynn Hall
Thanks, Theresa. All the writers I've known and admired--like Elmer Kelton--says the characters take over the story. One surprised me the other day--who knew she'd been a lady of the night in her youth? I only know one writer of modest fame who said, "That's hooey. They're my characters, and they'll do what I tell them." Never did like his books.
ReplyDeleteMy name is Polly, and I am a pantser. Couldn't follow an outline if my life depended on it. It would spoil the surprise of my story. Everyone writes the way it works for him/her. I read that Jeffrey Deaver's outline takes 8 months, and when it's finished, so is the story. That is inconceivable to me. My character are me, every one of them, and they lead me around by the nose. I believe I'm schizophrenic when I write. So I'm on your side, Judy.
ReplyDeleteSorry, I accidently deleted this comment on my iphone:
ReplyDeleteFrom Judy Alter:
Thanks, Polly. I can't imagine outlining in detail--though I do a one-page rough idea--because ideas, scenes, sudden facts about characters occur to me all the time! That's what makes writing fun for me.
I'm pretty much a pantser, too. I have a general idea of plot and the characters I want. I always write a biography in advance of my murderer so I know why he/she feels he/she must do the dastardly deed. Sometimes, like in my 3rd book in its final draft, I'm sad because I like this character and hate to see him/her follow through with what he/she does. But starting with that opening chapter is always hard for me, and usually I have no idea how it's going to end. It sort of like paddling along and letting the current take me where it needs to go.
ReplyDeleteI'm a pantser, too, Judy. I always write a biography of my murderer in advance so I know who he/she is and why they think they need to perform the dastardly deed. I always have a plot in my mind before starting, too, but from then on it's paddling along letting the current and the characters take me where they need to go. The hardest part for me is that opening chapter and just getting started.
ReplyDeleteGloria, I think that's the key--the characters take us where we need to go. I never though of a biography of the murderer--maybe I didn't want to know him or her that well. But honestly, I once got two-thirds of the way through and still didn't know who the villain was. When I figured it out, I had to go back and put him in earlier scenes so he didn't appear out of nowhere:-)
ReplyDelete